![]() ServicesĮxamples of the Fair Opportunity Process DEIS II Fair Opportunity Consideration Process Minimum Guarantee Program Officials’ and/or Customers’ InvolvementĬompeting Orders for Products vs. Using Past Performance in Order PlacementĬHAPTER 5 - FAIR OPPORTUNITY CONSIDERATIONS Agency FlexibilityĮxceptions to Fair Opportunity to be Considered Only One Contractor is Capable Non-Mandatory versus Mandatory Proposal Submissionĭecentralized Ordering Use of Handbooks, Standard Forms, and Conferences Using Past Performance as an Evaluation Factor ![]() Streamlining Ordering Techniques Use of Oral Presentations Use of Streamlined Techniques to Award Initial ContractsĬHAPTER 4 - ORDERING PROCEDURES Performance-Based Statement of Work for Ordersĭelegation of Procurement Authority to Other Agencies Price Changes and Technology Refreshment Small Business Considerations Streamlining Development of the Solicitation Use of Multiple Award Contracts to Buy Other ServicesĬHAPTER 3 - STRUCTURE OF MULTIPLE AWARD CONTRACTS Developing the Statement of Workĭetermining the Number of Contract Awards Use of Multiple Award Contracts to Buy Information Technology Relationship to Other Contracting Authorities The publication will also be available through the Internet on the Acquisition Reform Network (ARNet) at Steven Kelman The interagency team was also instrumental in ensuring that the regulatory guidance in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) conformed to the FASA authority.Ĭopies of this publication may be obtained from the Executive Office of the President's Publications Office by calling 20, or writing the Office of Publications, 725 17th Street, NW, Room 2200, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. In addition, we thank the interagency Multiple Award Contracting Team for sharing their experiences and providing information on their contracts. Their input helped to form the basis for this interim document. ![]() We thank the procurement and program officials from the major departments and agencies, as well as industry officials, who provided information on their experiences using task and delivery order contracts. Instead they are techniques that may help contracting officials take advantage of the flexibilities authorized by FASA when using multiple award task and delivery order contracts. We plan to issue the final edition once we have additional information on best practices and lessons learned from agencies’ use of these contracts. These practices may or may not be applicable to other industries, but agencies are encouraged to use them, as appropriate. Many of the examples and best practices pertain to the information technology industry. To help agencies better understand this contracting approach, this interim document highlights best practices in key phases of the multiple award contracting process including, among other areas, the "fair opportunity to be considered" requirement and streamlined ordering processes. Thanks to the clarification provided in FASA, agencies can now use these contracts with greater confidence, and, at the same time, realize the benefits of an ongoing competitive environment throughout the duration of the contract while minimizing the delays of conducting a separate procurement for each requirement. FASA now authorizes the use of multiple award task and delivery order contracts. ![]() Throughout this document, the term "multiple award contracts" has the same meaning as "multiple award task and delivery order contracts." (These contracts should be distinguished from the multiple award contracts awarded under the General Services Administration's (GSA's) Federal Supply Schedule Program.)Īgencies have gained a great deal of experience using single award ID/IQ or task order contracts. These contracts allow the government to acquire an indefinite quantity, within stated limits, of supplies or services during a fixed period, with deliveries or performance to be scheduled by placing orders with the contractor. These contracts are commonly known as indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (ID/IQ) or umbrella contracts. This interim document contains our current views on best practices in the use of task and delivery order contracts, in particular multiple award contracts, as authorized by the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA). This is the fourth in a series of publications discussing best practices developed by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |